Evidence-based health information: it is not medical advice and does not replace an eye examination.Information, not medical advice. Disclaimer

Orthokeratology: night lenses against myopia

You put them in in the evening, take them out in the morning and see sharply by day. How night contact lenses work, how far they slow myopia in children according to studies and what risks they carry.

By the editorial teamUpdated 10 min read10 studies and sources citedAI-generated text
Illustration At night a rigid lens flattens the centre of the cornea; during the day, without the lens, light comes into focus on the retina and vision is sharp. The effect is temporary: it fades if the lenses are not worn regularly.

In the evening, before going to sleep, a ten-year-old girl places two small rigid lenses on her eyes. In the morning she takes them out, and all day she sees the blackboard sharply without wearing anything on her eyes. It is not a trick: night contact lenses, which specialists call orthokeratology, reshape the form of the cornea for a few hours.

Today they are prescribed mainly to children, with an added aim: to slow the myopia that increases during growth1. Here is what the studies say about the effect and the risks.

In brief

  • Orthokeratology uses rigid gas-permeable lenses, worn at night, that temporarily reshape the cornea: by day you see sharply, but the effect fades when the lenses are no longer worn1.
  • In children it slows the lengthening of the eye, the cause of myopia that grows: in the 2023 Cochrane review, by 0.19 millimetres at one year and by 0.28 at two3.
  • The effect seems greater in children who start younger, and at the end of treatment the eye may start lengthening again faster4,5,6,7.
  • The main risk is an infection of the cornea, microbial keratitis, rare but potentially serious; hygiene, regular check-ups and no tap water on the lenses are indicated as essential conditions8,9,10.
  • Most studies come from Asia and last two or three years at most: European and long-term data are lacking3,5.
In this article
  1. How night contact lenses work
  2. How much they slow myopia in children
  3. After treatment ends
  4. The risk of infection: what studies say
  5. Who may be a candidate
  6. Frequently asked questions
  7. Sources

How night contact lenses work

Orthokeratology lenses are rigid gas-permeable lenses, with a geometry designed to reshape the cornea1,8. During sleep they flatten the centre of the cornea: on waking, myopia is reduced for some hours, and the wearer can see well during the day1. It is a temporary effect: to maintain it the lenses must be worn regularly.

The second effect, the one on the growth of the eye, has to do with the periphery. Myopia in children increases mainly because the eye lengthens. According to the most studied hypothesis, the reshaped cornea changes the way light reaches the edges of the retina, creating a blur that would restrain the stimulus to lengthen; the exact mechanism, however, is not yet known2. The other lenses and glasses that exploit the same principle are described in the article on lenses and glasses to slow myopia.

Ordinary rigid lenses, worn by day, do not give this result: in the 2023 Cochrane review they showed no differences compared with the control groups3. What seems to count is the design that reshapes the cornea, not the material.

How much they slow myopia in children

The study

The ROMIO study: two years of comparison with glasses

In a randomised trial, 102 children aged 6 to 10, with myopia between 0.50 and 4 dioptres, were assigned to night lenses or to ordinary glasses for two years; 78 completed the trial. The eye lengthened on average by 0.36 millimetres with the lenses and by 0.63 with the glasses: a slowing of 43%. Among children aged 7–8 with glasses, 65% had myopia that was growing fast (more than one dioptre a year), against 20% of those with the lenses. Five children stopped the lenses because of adverse events4.

The 2023 Cochrane review pooled 64 randomised trials with 11,617 children aged 4 to 18. In the control groups the eye lengthened on average by 0.31 millimetres in a year and by 0.56 in two; with orthokeratology the lengthening was less by 0.19 millimetres at one year and by 0.28 at two3. A report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology, based on 13 studies, translates these numbers in an intuitive way: in two years about 0.3 millimetres of lengthening instead of 0.6, equal to a difference of about half a dioptre5.

Two details recur in several studies. The first is age: the effect seems greater in younger children, and the Academy’s report points in particular to those who start between 6 and 84,5. The second is combination with low-dose atropine eye drops. In a randomised trial on 164 children aged 8 to 12, orthokeratology together with 0.01% atropine slowed lengthening more than either treatment alone; in children aged 8 to 10, however, the difference compared with the lenses alone was not significant6. We discuss atropine in the article on low-dose atropine.

The limitations are those of all research on myopia. In the Cochrane review 61% of the studies came from China or other Asian countries, the duration ranged from one to three years and the certainty of the evidence from very low to moderate3. Studies on European children are few, although a 2020 review reports that in Europe one lens model has obtained specific authorisation for myopia control1.

After treatment ends

When a child no longer wears the lenses, the cornea returns to its previous shape, and with it the myopia1. What happens to the growth of the eye is more uncertain. According to a 2024 meta-analysis, after orthokeratology ended the eye lengthened by 0.10 millimetres more than in those who continued the lenses7, and the Academy’s report speaks of a possible rebound5. The Cochrane review, however, judges the evidence on this point inconclusive3. We do not yet know what the ideal duration of treatment is7.

The risk of infection: what studies say

Wearing contact lenses during sleep increases the risk of microbial keratitis, an infection of the cornea that, in severe cases, can leave permanent damage to vision5,10. It is the point on which the studies are most cautious.

  • A 2016 systematic review, of 170 publications, concluded that the risk with orthokeratology is similar to that of other lenses worn at night; the most common complication was small superficial lesions of the cornea, and no long-term effects were found on its innermost layer8.
  • A working group of American experts, in 2021, observed that night lenses for orthokeratology might increase the risk of infection in children, in particular from Acanthamoeba, an amoeba that lives in water, and that failure to follow the rules of use remains an important risk factor10.
  • The 2024 meta-analysis found adverse events up to about four times more frequent than with traditional contact lenses, but with evidence that is still fragile7.

The study

The first 50 cases of infection

A 2005 review collected the first 50 published cases of microbial keratitis in people wearing orthokeratology lenses. 80% came from East Asia and 61% involved young people aged 9 to 15. In 52% of cases the microbe was Pseudomonas, in 30% Acanthamoeba. Recurring factors included wrong cleaning of the lenses, failure to follow instructions and continuing to wear them despite discomfort; the authors conclude that rinsing with tap water should be eliminated. The review does not allow an estimate of how often infection occurs9.

The risk linked to water is described in the article on contact lenses, showering and swimming pools.

Who may be a candidate

In the ROMIO study, for example, the children had myopia between 0.50 and 4 dioptres and limited astigmatism4. According to the Academy’s report, the effect may be greater in the youngest and in those with larger-than-average pupils5. In many countries the lenses are authorised to temporarily reduce myopia, and are prescribed mainly, but not only, to children1.

Consistency matters a great deal: the review on safety indicates as conditions for a good result correct application, cleaning rules followed rigorously, regular check-ups and prompt treatment of complications8. It is a daily commitment for the whole family, and costs and reimbursement vary greatly from one European country to another.

When to talk to an ophthalmologist

  • The same day, if you wear night lenses or your child does: a red and painful eye, strong discomfort in light, vision that drops or discharge. They can be signs of an infection of the cornea5,10; continuing to wear the lenses despite discomfort is one of the risk factors described9. You will find the other warning signs on our page about eye emergencies.
  • If in the morning vision is no longer as sharp as before, or gets worse during the day: it is a reason for a check with whoever prescribed the lenses.
  • Scheduled check-ups are part of the treatment: they also serve to recognise and treat complications in time8.

Frequently asked questions

Does orthokeratology make myopia go away?

No. It corrects myopia for some hours by reshaping the cornea, but the effect fades when the lenses are no longer worn1. In children it can slow the increase in myopia while treatment continues3,7.

From what age can night contact lenses be used?

The studies have involved children as young as 6, and the effect seems greater in those who start between 6 and 84,5. The decision is made with the ophthalmologist, also taking into account the daily commitment the lenses require8.

Are night contact lenses dangerous?

The main risk is an infection of the cornea, rare but potentially serious5. How much higher it is than with other lenses is uncertain: one review finds it similar to that of other lenses worn at night8, another finds adverse events more frequent than with traditional lenses, with fragile evidence7. On the importance of hygiene and check-ups the sources agree8,10.

Night contact lenses are among the tools with a measured effect on the growth of myopia in children3,5. Their value, however, lies in the balance between a benefit measured in tenths of a millimetre and a rare but serious risk, which depends greatly on how the lenses are used and checked8,9.

Sources

  1. Bullimore MA, Johnson LA. Overnight orthokeratology. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2020;43(4):322-332. doi:10.1016/j.clae.2020.03.018 · PubMed 32331970
  2. Li X, Friedman IB, Medow NB, Zhang C. Update on Orthokeratology in Managing Progressive Myopia in Children: Efficacy, Mechanisms, and Concerns. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2017;54(3):142-148. doi:10.3928/01913913-20170106-01 · PubMed 28092397
  3. Lawrenson JG, Shah R, Huntjens B, Downie LE, Virgili G, Dhakal R, et al. Interventions for myopia control in children: a living systematic review and network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023;2(2):CD014758. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD014758.pub2 · PubMed 36809645 · PMC
  4. Cho P, Cheung SW. Retardation of myopia in Orthokeratology (ROMIO) study: a 2-year randomized clinical trial. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53(11):7077-85. doi:10.1167/iovs.12-10565 · PubMed 22969068
  5. VanderVeen DK, Kraker RT, Pineles SL, Hutchinson AK, Wilson LB, Galvin JA, et al. Use of Orthokeratology for the Prevention of Myopic Progression in Children: A Report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology. 2019;126(4):623-636. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.11.026 · PubMed 30476518
  6. Xu S, Li Z, Zhao W, Zheng B, Jiang J, Ye G, et al. Effect of atropine, orthokeratology and combined treatments for myopia control: a 2-year stratified randomised clinical trial. Br J Ophthalmol. 2023;107(12):1812-1817. doi:10.1136/bjo-2022-321272 · PubMed 36229177
  7. Sartor L, Hunter DS, Vo ML, Samarawickrama C. Benefits and risks of orthokeratology treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Ophthalmol. 2024;44(1):239. doi:10.1007/s10792-024-03175-w · PubMed 38904856 · PMC
  8. Liu YM, Xie P. The Safety of Orthokeratology–A Systematic Review. Eye Contact Lens. 2016;42(1):35-42. doi:10.1097/ICL.0000000000000219 · PubMed 26704136 · PMC
  9. Watt K, Swarbrick HA. Microbial keratitis in overnight orthokeratology: review of the first 50 cases. Eye Contact Lens. 2005;31(5):201-8. doi:10.1097/01.icl.0000179705.23313.7e · PubMed 16163011
  10. Szczotka-Flynn LB, Shovlin JP, Schnider CM, Caffery BE, Alfonso EC, Carnt NA, et al. American Academy of Optometry Microbial Keratitis Think Tank. Optom Vis Sci. 2021;98(3):182-198. doi:10.1097/OPX.0000000000001664 · PubMed 33771951 · PMC

Study titles are given in their original language of publication. The superscript numbers in the text refer to these sources; citation details come from PubMed (National Library of Medicine).

From the same section

Read next